Noble, Samuel - 1774

To the PRINTERS of the Pensilvania <sic> Journal.
OBSERVING in the Pensilvania <sic> packet of this day, a Notification “that a number of persons composed of the members” of all the Societies in this city met, and unanimously agreed, that it “would be proper to express their sympathy, for their brethren” at Boston, by suspending all business on the first day of next “month.”—The people called Quakers, tho tenderly sympathising <sic> with the distressed, and justly sensible of the value of our religious and civil rights and that it is our duty to assert them in a Christian spirit; yet, in order to obviate any misapprehensions, which may be concerning us, think it necessary to declare, that no person or persons were authorized to represent us on this occasion, and if any of our community have countenanced or encouraged this proposal they have manifested great inattention to our religious principles and profession, and acted contrary to the rules of christian discipline established for the preservation of order and good government among us.

Signed on behalf, and at the desire of the Elders and Overseers of the several meetings of our religious society in Philadelphia and other Friends met on the occasion, the 30th of the 5th month, 1774.

JOHN REYNELL.

JAMES PEMBERTON.

SAMUEL NOBLE.

~ Virginia Gazette, 09-Jun-1774, Page 4, Columns 2 & 3

Pemberton, James - 1774

To the PRINTERS of the Pensilvania <sic> Journal.
OBSERVING in the Pensilvania <sic> packet of this day, a Notification “that a number of persons composed of the members” of all the Societies in this city met, and unanimously agreed, that it “would be proper to express their sympathy, for their brethren” at Boston, by suspending all business on the first day of next “month.”—The people called Quakers, tho tenderly sympathising <sic> with the distressed, and justly sensible of the value of our religious and civil rights and that it is our duty to assert them in a Christian spirit; yet, in order to obviate any misapprehensions, which may be concerning us, think it necessary to declare, that no person or persons were authorized to represent us on this occasion, and if any of our community have countenanced or encouraged this proposal they have manifested great inattention to our religious principles and profession, and acted contrary to the rules of christian discipline established for the preservation of order and good government among us.

Signed on behalf, and at the desire of the Elders and Overseers of the several meetings of our religious society in Philadelphia and other Friends met on the occasion, the 30th of the 5th month, 1774.

JOHN REYNELL.

JAMES PEMBERTON.

SAMUEL NOBLE.

~ Virginia Gazette, 09-Jun-1774, Page 4, Columns 2 & 3

Reynell, John - 1774

To the PRINTERS of the Pensilvania <sic> Journal.
OBSERVING in the Pensilvania <sic> packet of this day, a Notification “that a number of persons composed of the members” of all the Societies in this city met, and unanimously agreed, that it “would be proper to express their sympathy, for their brethren” at Boston, by suspending all business on the first day of next “month.”—The people called Quakers, tho tenderly sympathising <sic> with the distressed, and justly sensible of the value of our religious and civil rights and that it is our duty to assert them in a Christian spirit; yet, in order to obviate any misapprehensions, which may be concerning us, think it necessary to declare, that no person or persons were authorized to represent us on this occasion, and if any of our community have countenanced or encouraged this proposal they have manifested great inattention to our religious principles and profession, and acted contrary to the rules of christian discipline established for the preservation of order and good government among us.

Signed on behalf, and at the desire of the Elders and Overseers of the several meetings of our religious society in Philadelphia and other Friends met on the occasion, the 30th of the 5th month, 1774.

JOHN REYNELL.

JAMES PEMBERTON.

SAMUEL NOBLE.

~ Virginia Gazette, 09-Jun-1774, Page 4, Columns 2 & 3

Oliver, Mr. - 1774

House of Commons, May 24th.
At a quarter past three o’clock Lord North came, and the order of the day, for the whole House going into a Committee on the Boston bill, was read.  The Speaker left the chair, and the House resolved itself into a Committee, Mr. Grey Cowper, Chairman.

Lord North spake <sic> for a considerable time in support of the bill, and the clauses were all agreed to, and the blanks filled up.  The Committee broke up immediately, and made their report, when the bill was ordered to be read a second time immediately and ingrossed.

Mr. R. Fuller made a motion, that instead of the Boston bill, a fine of 20,000£ be inflicted on the Bostonians for their demolishing the tea belonging to the East India Company.  The motion occasioned a debate of upwards of four hours, the principle speakers in which were Lord North, Mr. Jenkinson, Mr. Herbert, General Conway, Mr. Gascoigne, Mr. Ward, Colonel Barre, and Mr. Montague.  On the opposite side, Mr. Byng, Mr. Dempster, Mr. Fuller, Mr. C. Fox, Mr. Oliver.
~ Virginia Gazette, 09-Jun-1774, Page 4, Column 2

Fox, C. - 1774

House of Commons, May 24th.
At a quarter past three o’clock Lord North came, and the order of the day, for the whole House going into a Committee on the Boston bill, was read.  The Speaker left the chair, and the House resolved itself into a Committee, Mr. Grey Cowper, Chairman.

Lord North spake <sic> for a considerable time in support of the bill, and the clauses were all agreed to, and the blanks filled up.  The Committee broke up immediately, and made their report, when the bill was ordered to be read a second time immediately and ingrossed.

Mr. R. Fuller made a motion, that instead of the Boston bill, a fine of 20,000£ be inflicted on the Bostonians for their demolishing the tea belonging to the East India Company.  The motion occasioned a debate of upwards of four hours, the principle speakers in which were Lord North, Mr. Jenkinson, Mr. Herbert, General Conway, Mr. Gascoigne, Mr. Ward, Colonel Barre, and Mr. Montague.  On the opposite side, Mr. Byng, Mr. Dempster, Mr. Fuller, Mr. C. Fox, Mr. Oliver.
~ Virginia Gazette, 09-Jun-1774, Page 4, Column 2

Dempster, Mr. - 1774

House of Commons, May 24th.
At a quarter past three o’clock Lord North came, and the order of the day, for the whole House going into a Committee on the Boston bill, was read.  The Speaker left the chair, and the House resolved itself into a Committee, Mr. Grey Cowper, Chairman.

Lord North spake <sic> for a considerable time in support of the bill, and the clauses were all agreed to, and the blanks filled up.  The Committee broke up immediately, and made their report, when the bill was ordered to be read a second time immediately and ingrossed.

Mr. R. Fuller made a motion, that instead of the Boston bill, a fine of 20,000£ be inflicted on the Bostonians for their demolishing the tea belonging to the East India Company.  The motion occasioned a debate of upwards of four hours, the principle speakers in which were Lord North, Mr. Jenkinson, Mr. Herbert, General Conway, Mr. Gascoigne, Mr. Ward, Colonel Barre, and Mr. Montague.  On the opposite side, Mr. Byng, Mr. Dempster, Mr. Fuller, Mr. C. Fox, Mr. Oliver.
~ Virginia Gazette, 09-Jun-1774, Page 4, Column 2

Byng, Mr. - 1774

House of Commons, May 24th.
At a quarter past three o’clock Lord North came, and the order of the day, for the whole House going into a Committee on the Boston bill, was read.  The Speaker left the chair, and the House resolved itself into a Committee, Mr. Grey Cowper, Chairman.

Lord North spake <sic> for a considerable time in support of the bill, and the clauses were all agreed to, and the blanks filled up.  The Committee broke up immediately, and made their report, when the bill was ordered to be read a second time immediately and ingrossed.

Mr. R. Fuller made a motion, that instead of the Boston bill, a fine of 20,000£ be inflicted on the Bostonians for their demolishing the tea belonging to the East India Company.  The motion occasioned a debate of upwards of four hours, the principle speakers in which were Lord North, Mr. Jenkinson, Mr. Herbert, General Conway, Mr. Gascoigne, Mr. Ward, Colonel Barre, and Mr. Montague.  On the opposite side, Mr. Byng, Mr. Dempster, Mr. Fuller, Mr. C. Fox, Mr. Oliver.
~ Virginia Gazette, 09-Jun-1774, Page 4, Column 2

Montague, Mr. - 1774

House of Commons, May 24th.
At a quarter past three o’clock Lord North came, and the order of the day, for the whole House going into a Committee on the Boston bill, was read.  The Speaker left the chair, and the House resolved itself into a Committee, Mr. Grey Cowper, Chairman.

Lord North spake <sic> for a considerable time in support of the bill, and the clauses were all agreed to, and the blanks filled up.  The Committee broke up immediately, and made their report, when the bill was ordered to be read a second time immediately and ingrossed.

Mr. R. Fuller made a motion, that instead of the Boston bill, a fine of 20,000£ be inflicted on the Bostonians for their demolishing the tea belonging to the East India Company.  The motion occasioned a debate of upwards of four hours, the principle speakers in which were Lord North, Mr. Jenkinson, Mr. Herbert, General Conway, Mr. Gascoigne, Mr. Ward, Colonel Barre, and Mr. Montague.  On the opposite side, Mr. Byng, Mr. Dempster, Mr. Fuller, Mr. C. Fox, Mr. Oliver.
~ Virginia Gazette, 09-Jun-1774, Page 4, Column 2

Ward, Mr. - 1774

House of Commons, May 24th.
At a quarter past three o’clock Lord North came, and the order of the day, for the whole House going into a Committee on the Boston bill, was read.  The Speaker left the chair, and the House resolved itself into a Committee, Mr. Grey Cowper, Chairman.

Lord North spake <sic> for a considerable time in support of the bill, and the clauses were all agreed to, and the blanks filled up.  The Committee broke up immediately, and made their report, when the bill was ordered to be read a second time immediately and ingrossed.

Mr. R. Fuller made a motion, that instead of the Boston bill, a fine of 20,000£ be inflicted on the Bostonians for their demolishing the tea belonging to the East India Company.  The motion occasioned a debate of upwards of four hours, the principle speakers in which were Lord North, Mr. Jenkinson, Mr. Herbert, General Conway, Mr. Gascoigne, Mr. Ward, Colonel Barre, and Mr. Montague.  On the opposite side, Mr. Byng, Mr. Dempster, Mr. Fuller, Mr. C. Fox, Mr. Oliver.
~ Virginia Gazette, 09-Jun-1774, Page 4, Column 2

Gascoigne, Mr. - 1774

House of Commons, May 24th.
At a quarter past three o’clock Lord North came, and the order of the day, for the whole House going into a Committee on the Boston bill, was read.  The Speaker left the chair, and the House resolved itself into a Committee, Mr. Grey Cowper, Chairman.

Lord North spake <sic> for a considerable time in support of the bill, and the clauses were all agreed to, and the blanks filled up.  The Committee broke up immediately, and made their report, when the bill was ordered to be read a second time immediately and ingrossed.

Mr. R. Fuller made a motion, that instead of the Boston bill, a fine of 20,000£ be inflicted on the Bostonians for their demolishing the tea belonging to the East India Company.  The motion occasioned a debate of upwards of four hours, the principle speakers in which were Lord North, Mr. Jenkinson, Mr. Herbert, General Conway, Mr. Gascoigne, Mr. Ward, Colonel Barre, and Mr. Montague.  On the opposite side, Mr. Byng, Mr. Dempster, Mr. Fuller, Mr. C. Fox, Mr. Oliver.
~ Virginia Gazette, 09-Jun-1774, Page 4, Column 2

Herbert, Mr. - 1774

House of Commons, May 24th.
At a quarter past three o’clock Lord North came, and the order of the day, for the whole House going into a Committee on the Boston bill, was read.  The Speaker left the chair, and the House resolved itself into a Committee, Mr. Grey Cowper, Chairman.

Lord North spake <sic> for a considerable time in support of the bill, and the clauses were all agreed to, and the blanks filled up.  The Committee broke up immediately, and made their report, when the bill was ordered to be read a second time immediately and ingrossed.

Mr. R. Fuller made a motion, that instead of the Boston bill, a fine of 20,000£ be inflicted on the Bostonians for their demolishing the tea belonging to the East India Company.  The motion occasioned a debate of upwards of four hours, the principle speakers in which were Lord North, Mr. Jenkinson, Mr. Herbert, General Conway, Mr. Gascoigne, Mr. Ward, Colonel Barre, and Mr. Montague.  On the opposite side, Mr. Byng, Mr. Dempster, Mr. Fuller, Mr. C. Fox, Mr. Oliver.
~ Virginia Gazette, 09-Jun-1774, Page 4, Column 2

Jenkinson, Mr. - 1774

House of Commons, May 24th.
At a quarter past three o’clock Lord North came, and the order of the day, for the whole House going into a Committee on the Boston bill, was read.  The Speaker left the chair, and the House resolved itself into a Committee, Mr. Grey Cowper, Chairman.

Lord North spake <sic> for a considerable time in support of the bill, and the clauses were all agreed to, and the blanks filled up.  The Committee broke up immediately, and made their report, when the bill was ordered to be read a second time immediately and ingrossed.

Mr. R. Fuller made a motion, that instead of the Boston bill, a fine of 20,000£ be inflicted on the Bostonians for their demolishing the tea belonging to the East India Company.  The motion occasioned a debate of upwards of four hours, the principle speakers in which were Lord North, Mr. Jenkinson, Mr. Herbert, General Conway, Mr. Gascoigne, Mr. Ward, Colonel Barre, and Mr. Montague.  On the opposite side, Mr. Byng, Mr. Dempster, Mr. Fuller, Mr. C. Fox, Mr. Oliver.
~ Virginia Gazette, 09-Jun-1774, Page 4, Column 2

Fuller R. - 1774

House of Commons, May 24th.
At a quarter past three o’clock Lord North came, and the order of the day, for the whole House going into a Committee on the Boston bill, was read.  The Speaker left the chair, and the House resolved itself into a Committee, Mr. Grey Cowper, Chairman.

Lord North spake <sic> for a considerable time in support of the bill, and the clauses were all agreed to, and the blanks filled up.  The Committee broke up immediately, and made their report, when the bill was ordered to be read a second time immediately and ingrossed.

Mr. R. Fuller made a motion, that instead of the fine of 20,000£ be inflicted on the Bostonians for their demolishing the tea belonging to the East India Company.  The motion occasioned a debate of upwards of four hours, the principle speakers in which were Lord North, Mr. Jenkinson, Mr. Herbert, General Conway, Mr. Gascoigne, Mr. Ward, Colonel Barre, and Mr. Montague.  On the opposite side, Mr. Byng, Mr. Dempster, Mr. Fuller, Mr. C. Fox, Mr. Oliver.
~ Virginia Gazette, 09-Jun-1774, Page 4, Column 2

Cowper, Grey - 1774

House of Commons, May 24th.
At a quarter past three o’clock Lord North came, and the order of the day, for the whole House going into a Committee on the Boston bill, was read.  The Speaker left the chair, and the House resolved itself into a Committee, Mr. Grey Cowper, Chairman.

Lord North spake <sic> for a considerable time in support of the bill, and the clauses were all agreed to, and the blanks filled up.  The Committee broke up immediately, and made their report, when the bill was ordered to be read a second time immediately and ingrossed.

Mr. R. Fuller made a motion, that instead of the fine of 20,000£ be inflicted on the Bostonians for their demolishing the tea belonging to the East India Company.  The motion occasioned a debate of upwards of four hours, the principle speakers in which were Lord North, Mr. Jenkinson, Mr. Herbert, General Conway, Mr. Gascoigne, Mr. Ward, Colonel Barre, and Mr. Montague.  On the opposite side, Mr. Byng, Mr. Dempster, Mr. Fuller, Mr. C. Fox, Mr. Oliver.
~ Virginia Gazette, 09-Jun-1774, Page 4, Column 2

Dalrymple, John (Sir) - 1774

Wednesday Sir John Dalrymple, at the bar of the House of Commons, as an instance of the loyalty of the town of Glasgow, told the following story, and desired the House would attend to him:

“When the Ptetender <sic> was to pass through Glasgow, he sent notice to the Inhabitants a day before, in order that hey might prepare to receive him ; but the Inhabitants detesting the man, and knowing the unjustness of the cause he was engaged in, instead of appearing joyful of the honour intended to be conferred upon them, all shut up their shops and windows, and he whole town seemed to be in mourning; this (added Sir John) had such an effect on Charly, that it struck more dampness on his and his followers spirits, than if they had seen 100,000 English soldiers and cannon before them ; and as a further proof of the loyalty of Glasgow, there was but one person in the whole town that joined the Pretender ; this person (added Sir John) had the good luck not to be taken by the English, but the town of Glasgow would not suffer such a rebel to escape punishment ; for on his return to Glasgow they hung him up in the public market, as a disapprobation of his conduct.”
~ Virginia Gazette, 09-Jun-1774, Page 4, Column 2

Brown, William - 1774

Bristol, April 2.  Last Saturday Wm. Brown a Journeyman Woolcomber at Wells, cut his throat and soon expired.----The evening before, the father of a young woman that he courted, forbade him his house: enraged at this treatment, he went to the Serjeant of a Regiment that lies in that City to enlist; they sat up very late, and it was then agreed for them to sleep together.  The Serjeant got up early in the morning to write a letter, and left his penknife on the table, with which this young man committed the rash deed.  The young woman he courted is almost distracted, and his parents are inconsolable.
~ Virginia Gazette, 09-Jun-1774, Page 4, Column 2

Heatly, Richard - 1774

From the London Gazette, April 5.
Petersburgh, March 11.
The bill to dissolve the marriage of Richard Heatly, and to enable him to marry again.
~ Virginia Gazette, 09-Jun-1774, Page 4, Column 1